The proposed “Luigi Mangione Act” is opening up in popularity as it may make it harder for health insurance companies to reject claims

Recently, the California voting initiative proposal was named after Killer Luigi Mangione, CEO of United Healthcare.

Yes, you read it correctly. According to the initiative document, the proposed name is the Luigi Mangione Access to Health Care Act.

It recommends: “No insurer can delay, refuse or modify any medical procedure or medication…recommended by the treatment or attending physician, delay, rejection or modification may result in disability, death, amputation, permanent disfigurement, [or] Any loss or reduction of physical function. ”

In addition, any decision to delay, refuse or modify a drug or medical procedure must also be made by the doctor himself on behalf of the insurer.

And hiring “anyone who is not a doctor reviewing a treatment or a decision made by a attending physician is a felony.”

This would be a major change for insurance companies – Propublica found that some of them refused to even claim without reading them.

On average, households in the U.S. spend thousands of dollars on health insurance annually, however, about one-fifth of online in-network insurance claims were rejected in 2023, according to limited data from nonprofit KFF mining for health care policies.

According to insurance providers and states, Rejection rate It is reportedly achieved It was about 54% in the same year.

Why does this happen? Well, in a conversation with ABC Action News, a doctor shared his personal insights:

“The national average, and the average of my physician billing company, is 20% of the debt,” shared Dr. Bill Hennessey. “It is based primarily on one thing…price tags. The more expensive the care, the more likely it is to refuse.”

It's a vibrant theme, and the response to the proposal has been extensive, like most news as stated by the Mangione name.

His name combined with the proposal seems to cause immediate discomfort in the opposition online. one reply Write on X: “Name as a naming that the murderer will not insist on.

But others delayed in response to people who claimed the proposal was “assassinated on the Street of Glory,” meaning it was intended to calm future unrest and dissatisfaction with the U.S. health care system.

“The focus of this behavior is to keep people from needing to kill the CEO of health care. This is called the Luigi Mangien Act because Luigi Mangien is the reason they wrote the bill for it,” said someone Write.

Overall, a middle-aged faction ignored the name and said they believed that “this behavior could greatly improve access to health care” because “insurance companies are responsible for the well-being and needs of patients.”

What do you think of the voting plan proposal and its name? Let us know in the comments.