Us News

Global AI arms race: Risk, ethics and the struggle for control

Super Intelligent AI: Is the key to enlightenment or the dangerous doorstep? The competition for the dominance of artificial intelligence worldwide is at a crossroads. Getty Images/Unplash+

Two horizons are in front of us. It can also be achieved. The first one leads to Providence. Another one, ruined. We must follow the expected AI growth line. Sliding on both sides causes danger. The transfer of unregulated control to the minority and the powerful leads to absolute corruption. Excessive caution and inadequate regulation have resulted in AI solutions failing to approach any tangible ROIC. To explain Charles Dickens, will AI bring the best or worst era? Both destinies are equally feasible and are directly in front of us.

People must be the arbitrator of AI, or risk reproduction

There is an ai tiger on our tail, but there must be a rich man. People must control. We must ensure that tigers exist for useful services. How is this done? By ensuring that morals and values ​​are built into this tiger from the outset. We had to eat that man and we had to speak it as early as possible. Untamed tigers can be catastrophic, but AI exploiting and pointing in the right direction can generate huge growth globally and cure some of the biggest diseases on Earth today.

At this time, AI is still a child. As a parent, I will never dream of sending my children into the world without instilling morality, morality and right and wrong. In this truly super smart game, we can’t ignore the fundamentals of infancy. On this baseline, we are morally obliged to code true morality and morality into any AI and then let go of the world. It can't simply find its own way. It will be damaged and produce the opposite of what we need.

Falseness in AI hype

Another danger is that when the investment capital returns, the AI ​​Tiger of this marketing turns out to be a mouse. Likewise, one must carefully look at the signal-to-noise ratio, which is quite weak in today's market. We need to judge the capabilities of AI by its ability to fight against humans. Ask a few questions you want to ask human employees to do. Most “AI” applications will fail in the basic enterprise version of Turing tests.

We must formulate international objective benchmarks for the IQ of these enterprise digital agents. Without such standards, businesses are rudderless and are whimsical about their marketing manuals that seem more attractive. As we stand now, AI is in danger of becoming another industry buzzword, and it will disappear from people’s minds as quickly as “synergy”, “destruction” or “offline.” Be careful when you watch TV tonight and pay attention to how many ads there are that claim to have “AI power” products. What do they even mean? Do these marketers know the first thing that really weighs behind this statement? I suspect the most important thing is.

Danger of autonomy

Real danger? When you cry too many times, no one is worried about the actual wolf knocking on the door. Bad actors in the space will hide their negative intentions and plans in the fog, which is due to the fog caused by the word “AI-driven” or simply “Artificial Intelligence”, knowing that these have become white noise for the masses. There, they discover freedom and evil and use their rewards and other societies to exploit real super wisdom. When it comes to this technology, we have to keep a high level of each other.

How many people can you trust to rate your assignments? Rating your own test? Write your own comment? My answer is “almost all”. When engaging in self-assessment, almost everyone will be honest. But few dishonest people will rule for us all. This is the danger of autonomy and self-regulation. The vast majority of honest actors have to hold these people accountable and take them to the world.

The role of government

Governments must guide AI purposefully and make minimum adjustments, focusing on essential people. Adjusted dials must be adjusted optimally between no adjustment and stifling adjustment. Over-regulation will plant seeds that fear stagnation of AI growth (which is currently the case in the EU), while the rest of the world can compete forward. We cannot live in the case of isolation regulations, where physical geographical boundaries are diluted by the previous and ubiquitous nature of AI technology. This line must be faithfully walked. A slip in either direction creates a future we want or need.

Chetan Dube is a pioneer in AI. He is the founder and CEO of Quant, which develops cutting-edge digital employee technology.

Dangerous competition for super smart AI: progress or Pandora's box?



Related Articles

Leave a Reply